Where do I even start today? Michelle Obama or Micheal Moore? Both make me want to vomit equally, so to talk about one first over the other is a great diservice. But it has to be done, so let's start with the Queen of America then move to the tub of shit with legs.
Luxury air travel and a European vacation are a sacrifice. Really, they are.
Is this pretentious snapperhead really that out of touch with reality? Yes, yes she is. She thinks that kids can only learn to ride a bike with government intervention? FUCKING SHIT ON A POGO STICK, THE LEVEL OF STUPIDITY HAS HIT A NEW LOW!!!
I actually don't have anything more to say on this subject. Princess Mao-bama, in all her stupidity, speaks for herself.
400pounds of shit in 50 pound sack is too dumb to understand why he's a fucking millionaire
Let's pretend for a second that fat boy wasn't a multi-millionaire. Let's pretend that he only made $100,000 a year for what he calls entertainment. Fuck that, let's pretend he only made $1 a year. The means for making that money is the same, capitalism, regardless of the amount earned. He gathers money for financing, takes that money and works to produce a product that people, stupid people, but people nonetheless, then exchange their money to view. That FREE WILL exchange of money for goods is CAPITALISM. You can't deny it, you can't sugar coat it, you can't spin it into another explanation. Your wealth is not confiscated by the government to fund his movies or to distribute tickets to the taxpayers. You aren't kidnapped from your house, dragged to the theatre, tied to the chair, your eyelids pried open, and forced to watch his movies. His speech and actions are purely for entertainment, I know this. I know he's just doing this to gather even more private wealth, but the way he acts like he's so serious about his views is fantastic. There's no way he can believe the diarreah that spews from his mouth, but it's even more mind-boggling that people follow along with his rhetoric, make him even more of a millionaire through capitalism, and then herald him as a messiah for communism. Don't you fucktards realize that if we go to communism that he will be immune to the misery that most will wallow in? OF COURSE HE DOESN'T GIVE TWO FARTS ABOUT COMMUNISM!!!! HE'S ALREADY GOT HIS "FUCK YOU" MONEY!!!
AAAAAGGGGHHHHH!! When you read these two articles you almost want to pass laws that allow for summary execution on the street so you can eliminate the stupidest person around.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Listen up, the U.S.A. is a Republic NOT a Democracy
OK, so for all of you out there in the U.S.A. that think you live in a democracy I have some bad news, you don't. You live in a Republic. What's the difference, you ask? A hell of lot. So watch where you're stepping because I'm about to drop some knowledge.
A republic is where the people in certain areas, or district, if you will, elect or appoint representatives. Those representatives then speak on behalf of THAT district only. The reason they only represent that district is because that district had a say in making that person a representative. In other words, a Senator from California doesn't represent citizens of Maryland because citizens of Maryland cannot vote for or against the California Senator. Why is the limited representation of a certain geographical group of people important? Because it is IMPOSSIBLE for one person to represent too big of a group of people. There are too many opinions, so the group of people represented must be small in order to get the message of that group out accurately to the rest of the country. Usually, the representative of the group represents that group very well. They speak the same, look the same, dress the same as the group they represent. For instance, there are very few political conservatives in the city of San Francisco. Like people tend to gravitate towards other like people. They want to be around other people that are like them because it is comfortable. And there's nothing wrong with that. In a republic small groups will get comparable representation to large groups, because there is a limited number of representatves, regardless of the actual amount of people in the entire country. This is important, also, so keep reading about a democracy to find out why.
A democracy is a majority rule, it is a mob rule. 50.1% of the people decide what 100% of people get. It's as simple as that. So if the U.S.A. was a democracy then California would have a huge sway over what happens to people in Maryland, because there are more people in California.
But wait, California already has more sway because they have more representation in government, so why is this better than a democracy? Good question. While it is true that they have more representation, it is curtailed through the republic model. And also remember that the representatives only can speak for their districts. So now we get into the specifics of the U.S. Federal government.
The states are represented in the Legislative Branch by Senators and Representatives. Every state has 2 Senators. These Senators are elected to represent each and every citizen of their state. For Rhode Island it's not so much, for California it is quite a few people. The Representatives are elected to represent ONLY the people in their district. The states are divided into districts and the people that live in that district have one Representative. So that means as a voter you get to vote for 3 elected officials in elections, 2 Senators and 1 Representative. These are the ONLY elected officials that represent YOU. So it doesn't matter who gets elected in the next district or the next state. You shouldn't care about that because there's nothing you can do about it and they don't speak for you. Will they have a different agenda than your representatives? I sure as fuck hope so. I can't think of anything that people in California would want that is 100% in line with what people in Maryland want. In other words, your representatives should fight tooth and nail for YOU. They shouldn't compromise on things that fuck you in the ass just because someone that lives 2000 miles away that they don't represent is whining and crying about it. Which brings us to our problem.
The elected officials in the Senate and House of Representatives are fucking stupid. Every single one of them. They all think they speak for everybody. Ever listen to a press conference where some dunderhead in Congress is droning on about how this, that, or the other is "best for America"? Just saying those words should get that mental giant thrown out of office. These dumbasses are not qualified to decide what is "best for America". But forget their miniscule intelligence, THEY AREN'T FUCKING ELECTED TO SPEAK FOR AMERICA!!!!! They are elected to speak for their district. The MOST that their district will be is an entire state, and that's only if they are a SENATOR. So Nazi Pelosi, Chucky Schumer, Chris Dolt, Babs Mikulski, and all the rest of the fucktards need to shut the fuck up. Only care about your district. If I didn't have an opportunity to vote for or against your existence in Congress then YOU DON'T SPEAK FOR ME!!! Period, end of fucking sentence, shut the fuck up, and go fuck yourself, asshole!!
So for the record, again, Nazi Pelosi should be slapped every time she talks about what "is best for America". She needs to change that line to what "is best for my district". They all do.
FUCK!!! People are stupid. But if you made it this far you are a little bit smarter.
A republic is where the people in certain areas, or district, if you will, elect or appoint representatives. Those representatives then speak on behalf of THAT district only. The reason they only represent that district is because that district had a say in making that person a representative. In other words, a Senator from California doesn't represent citizens of Maryland because citizens of Maryland cannot vote for or against the California Senator. Why is the limited representation of a certain geographical group of people important? Because it is IMPOSSIBLE for one person to represent too big of a group of people. There are too many opinions, so the group of people represented must be small in order to get the message of that group out accurately to the rest of the country. Usually, the representative of the group represents that group very well. They speak the same, look the same, dress the same as the group they represent. For instance, there are very few political conservatives in the city of San Francisco. Like people tend to gravitate towards other like people. They want to be around other people that are like them because it is comfortable. And there's nothing wrong with that. In a republic small groups will get comparable representation to large groups, because there is a limited number of representatves, regardless of the actual amount of people in the entire country. This is important, also, so keep reading about a democracy to find out why.
A democracy is a majority rule, it is a mob rule. 50.1% of the people decide what 100% of people get. It's as simple as that. So if the U.S.A. was a democracy then California would have a huge sway over what happens to people in Maryland, because there are more people in California.
But wait, California already has more sway because they have more representation in government, so why is this better than a democracy? Good question. While it is true that they have more representation, it is curtailed through the republic model. And also remember that the representatives only can speak for their districts. So now we get into the specifics of the U.S. Federal government.
The states are represented in the Legislative Branch by Senators and Representatives. Every state has 2 Senators. These Senators are elected to represent each and every citizen of their state. For Rhode Island it's not so much, for California it is quite a few people. The Representatives are elected to represent ONLY the people in their district. The states are divided into districts and the people that live in that district have one Representative. So that means as a voter you get to vote for 3 elected officials in elections, 2 Senators and 1 Representative. These are the ONLY elected officials that represent YOU. So it doesn't matter who gets elected in the next district or the next state. You shouldn't care about that because there's nothing you can do about it and they don't speak for you. Will they have a different agenda than your representatives? I sure as fuck hope so. I can't think of anything that people in California would want that is 100% in line with what people in Maryland want. In other words, your representatives should fight tooth and nail for YOU. They shouldn't compromise on things that fuck you in the ass just because someone that lives 2000 miles away that they don't represent is whining and crying about it. Which brings us to our problem.
The elected officials in the Senate and House of Representatives are fucking stupid. Every single one of them. They all think they speak for everybody. Ever listen to a press conference where some dunderhead in Congress is droning on about how this, that, or the other is "best for America"? Just saying those words should get that mental giant thrown out of office. These dumbasses are not qualified to decide what is "best for America". But forget their miniscule intelligence, THEY AREN'T FUCKING ELECTED TO SPEAK FOR AMERICA!!!!! They are elected to speak for their district. The MOST that their district will be is an entire state, and that's only if they are a SENATOR. So Nazi Pelosi, Chucky Schumer, Chris Dolt, Babs Mikulski, and all the rest of the fucktards need to shut the fuck up. Only care about your district. If I didn't have an opportunity to vote for or against your existence in Congress then YOU DON'T SPEAK FOR ME!!! Period, end of fucking sentence, shut the fuck up, and go fuck yourself, asshole!!
So for the record, again, Nazi Pelosi should be slapped every time she talks about what "is best for America". She needs to change that line to what "is best for my district". They all do.
FUCK!!! People are stupid. But if you made it this far you are a little bit smarter.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
*Yawn* . . . Liberals are boring . . .
Huh . . . wha' . . . oh, I'm sorry you woke me from my nap. You see, I was reading the news and . . . zzzzzz . . . uh . . . sorry, I dozed off again. Anyway, I was reading the news and it seems that the boring libs are at it again. To them, everybody who is opposed to the anti-capitalist president of the U.S.A. is a racist. Now, I'm not going to say that there are no racists out there. Sure there are. There are white racists who hate black/brown/yellow/purple/red/blue people, and there are black/brown/yellow/purple/red/blue racists that hate white people. But when we have a government that is spending TRILLIONS of dollars (and I am looking at you too President Bush) the only color I see is GREEN, MOTHERFUCKER!!!
So libs, get a new line. This racist thing has been overdone in the last few months. I'm not a racist, my wife isn't a racist, my friends aren't racists (that I know of) and conservative talk show hosts aren't racists. If you want racist go to Edmondson Village in the Baltimore ghetto or go to Cecil County Maryland. But make sure you know where you're going because if you end up in the wrong place you might be in a peck of trouble.
As far as the president is concerned, get used to it. Being president is the worst job in the world. But you really, really, really, really wanted it.
As far as you douchebag libs are concerned, shut the fuck up. "Your" president is a lying (uh-oh be prepared for incoming HoR rebuke) turd sandwich just like "my" president was. Being a turd sandwich doesn't make everyone else a racist, it just means he's a turd sandwich.
So if anyone is suffering from insomnia then just go to this link to hear the same old shit (pun intended) nowadays for defending a turd sandwich:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/15/carter_claims_there_is_racist_tone_against_obama.html
So libs, get a new line. This racist thing has been overdone in the last few months. I'm not a racist, my wife isn't a racist, my friends aren't racists (that I know of) and conservative talk show hosts aren't racists. If you want racist go to Edmondson Village in the Baltimore ghetto or go to Cecil County Maryland. But make sure you know where you're going because if you end up in the wrong place you might be in a peck of trouble.
As far as the president is concerned, get used to it. Being president is the worst job in the world. But you really, really, really, really wanted it.
As far as you douchebag libs are concerned, shut the fuck up. "Your" president is a lying (uh-oh be prepared for incoming HoR rebuke) turd sandwich just like "my" president was. Being a turd sandwich doesn't make everyone else a racist, it just means he's a turd sandwich.
So if anyone is suffering from insomnia then just go to this link to hear the same old shit (pun intended) nowadays for defending a turd sandwich:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/15/carter_claims_there_is_racist_tone_against_obama.html
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
I’m open minded and you’re either a degenerate tyrant or a self-righteous tyrant
So you either have liberals or conservatives, Democrats or Republicans, right-wing or left-wing. Both claim to stand for freedom, liberty, and the right to pursue happiness. Well both groups are full of shit. Both groups love big government. And both groups want to force their beliefs down the throats of everyone else.
You see on the left you have the morally degenerate tyrants. They walk around touting their “moral superiority” because they don’t care if people do drugs, they don’t care who people have sex with (especially if they are married *cough* Bill Clinton *cough* or homosexual), and they don’t care if women have abortions. But they do care if you believe in traditional marriage, or if you don’t want people to do drugs, or if you don’t want kill babies (yes, anything with a heartbeat is living you mental giants), or if you want to kill a cow because steak is so fucking delicious. However, they don’t believe you have the right to keep any wealth that you earn with your own hard work and initiative, and feel that because there are five words in the U.S. Constitution (“general welfare” and “necessary and proper”) that create an unlimited federal government which can do anything and everything under the sun “on your behalf.” Sound open minded to you?
But then there is the right, the self-righteous tyrants. They walk around touting their “moral superiority” because they want people to marry the opposite sex and have 2.3 kids. They want that nuclear family to stay in tact by preserving the intimate promises made by the spouses. They want to preserve life, even if it is still in the womb. However, they don’t want to admit that they like to imbibe in libations, they don’t want to admit that they have carnal desires that may be hard to control, and they don’t want to admit that mistakes could be made because of these normal human instincts. However, they do believe that if you work hard you should be able to spend your money how you want, as long as it’s not on whores, gambling, or drugs. Sound open minded to you?
HELL NO!! Neither side is open-minded, if you ask me. They both have an agenda and they both use government to push that agenda right up our asses whether we like it or not. On a good day they might use Vaseline. Taxes have only gone up since
George Washington. Sure, there might be tax credits here or a rebate there but let’s face it, we are paying more in taxes than we are not paying in taxes. Between income tax, sales tax, gasoline tax, cell phone plan tax, cable TV tax, food tax, property tax, road tax, dingle berry tax, farting tax, and a breathing tax, there is NOT A DAMN THING WE CAN DO IN THIS COUNTRY THAT THE GOVERNMENT (FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL) DOES NOT HAVE A HAND IN!! THESE MOTHERFUCKERS JUST THINK UP NEW WAYS TO STEAL YOUR MONEY!! AAAAAGGGGHHHH!!!
OK, sorry, I think I’m a little more composed now.
Anyway, let me break it down for you. Contrary to some people’s thoughts on me, I’m really one of the most open-minded people you will ever meet. You see, I have a set of rules, a code, if you will that I live by. These are used to keep my personal moral compass always pointed north. I do believe in the sanctity of marriage, because it’s a promise, and I take promises seriously. I believe that a fetus is a living being. I believe that if you earn something then NOBODY has the right to any of it just because they are alive and happen to live in your general vicinity. But, I don’t believe that a woman’s right to choose should be taken away. I don’t believe that marriage should be opposite sex only. What I do believe is that if you want to do something, then go ahead and do it as long as you don’t hurt anybody else. And let me tell you something, nitwit, when you take my money because you want to institute universal healthcare or public education or social security or Medicare or Medicaid then you are hurting me. Socialism hurts the individual and all of those programs are socialist. I don’t owe anybody anything and nobody owes me anything. I don’t want your money. I am not jealous of people that have more than me. I have what I have and I know that I earned it, fair and square. I did an honest day’s work for an honest day’s pay. So when I watch my flat-screen HD TV while sitting in my air conditioned house on my comfortable couch it’s because I’m tired after having worked all day. So fuck off and leave my money alone. But what about the children, you ask? You would just let them die in the streets while they are stupid because they didn’t have health care or an education? Well, I guess I have to say yes. I can only take care of my circle of influence. My circle of influence includes me, my spouse, and my children. Then it slowly reaches out to my parents and siblings. Then it even more slowly reaches out to extended family like grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. Only then does it extend out to the rest of the world. Now, if the core of that circle, which is me, is unable to earn wealth, then the rest of circle suffers, and no one will benefit. How can I provide for myself if I can’t work? How can I provide for my family when I can’t work? So while there is suffering in the world, and I feel terrible about it, it is also not my responsibility. Nor is it yours. Your responsibility is your circle of influence. Define your circle for yourself, but don’t define mine. Personally, I like my circle. I don’t think it’s an unreasonable circle, either.
So I have my own moral code and my own circle of influence. I never waiver from this and I think I’m living a pretty good life. I don’t see myself as selfish because I care about the people in my circle and my moral code doesn’t hurt anybody.
Now ask yourself if you’re really as open-minded as you claim to be.
You see on the left you have the morally degenerate tyrants. They walk around touting their “moral superiority” because they don’t care if people do drugs, they don’t care who people have sex with (especially if they are married *cough* Bill Clinton *cough* or homosexual), and they don’t care if women have abortions. But they do care if you believe in traditional marriage, or if you don’t want people to do drugs, or if you don’t want kill babies (yes, anything with a heartbeat is living you mental giants), or if you want to kill a cow because steak is so fucking delicious. However, they don’t believe you have the right to keep any wealth that you earn with your own hard work and initiative, and feel that because there are five words in the U.S. Constitution (“general welfare” and “necessary and proper”) that create an unlimited federal government which can do anything and everything under the sun “on your behalf.” Sound open minded to you?
But then there is the right, the self-righteous tyrants. They walk around touting their “moral superiority” because they want people to marry the opposite sex and have 2.3 kids. They want that nuclear family to stay in tact by preserving the intimate promises made by the spouses. They want to preserve life, even if it is still in the womb. However, they don’t want to admit that they like to imbibe in libations, they don’t want to admit that they have carnal desires that may be hard to control, and they don’t want to admit that mistakes could be made because of these normal human instincts. However, they do believe that if you work hard you should be able to spend your money how you want, as long as it’s not on whores, gambling, or drugs. Sound open minded to you?
HELL NO!! Neither side is open-minded, if you ask me. They both have an agenda and they both use government to push that agenda right up our asses whether we like it or not. On a good day they might use Vaseline. Taxes have only gone up since
George Washington. Sure, there might be tax credits here or a rebate there but let’s face it, we are paying more in taxes than we are not paying in taxes. Between income tax, sales tax, gasoline tax, cell phone plan tax, cable TV tax, food tax, property tax, road tax, dingle berry tax, farting tax, and a breathing tax, there is NOT A DAMN THING WE CAN DO IN THIS COUNTRY THAT THE GOVERNMENT (FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL) DOES NOT HAVE A HAND IN!! THESE MOTHERFUCKERS JUST THINK UP NEW WAYS TO STEAL YOUR MONEY!! AAAAAGGGGHHHH!!!
OK, sorry, I think I’m a little more composed now.
Anyway, let me break it down for you. Contrary to some people’s thoughts on me, I’m really one of the most open-minded people you will ever meet. You see, I have a set of rules, a code, if you will that I live by. These are used to keep my personal moral compass always pointed north. I do believe in the sanctity of marriage, because it’s a promise, and I take promises seriously. I believe that a fetus is a living being. I believe that if you earn something then NOBODY has the right to any of it just because they are alive and happen to live in your general vicinity. But, I don’t believe that a woman’s right to choose should be taken away. I don’t believe that marriage should be opposite sex only. What I do believe is that if you want to do something, then go ahead and do it as long as you don’t hurt anybody else. And let me tell you something, nitwit, when you take my money because you want to institute universal healthcare or public education or social security or Medicare or Medicaid then you are hurting me. Socialism hurts the individual and all of those programs are socialist. I don’t owe anybody anything and nobody owes me anything. I don’t want your money. I am not jealous of people that have more than me. I have what I have and I know that I earned it, fair and square. I did an honest day’s work for an honest day’s pay. So when I watch my flat-screen HD TV while sitting in my air conditioned house on my comfortable couch it’s because I’m tired after having worked all day. So fuck off and leave my money alone. But what about the children, you ask? You would just let them die in the streets while they are stupid because they didn’t have health care or an education? Well, I guess I have to say yes. I can only take care of my circle of influence. My circle of influence includes me, my spouse, and my children. Then it slowly reaches out to my parents and siblings. Then it even more slowly reaches out to extended family like grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. Only then does it extend out to the rest of the world. Now, if the core of that circle, which is me, is unable to earn wealth, then the rest of circle suffers, and no one will benefit. How can I provide for myself if I can’t work? How can I provide for my family when I can’t work? So while there is suffering in the world, and I feel terrible about it, it is also not my responsibility. Nor is it yours. Your responsibility is your circle of influence. Define your circle for yourself, but don’t define mine. Personally, I like my circle. I don’t think it’s an unreasonable circle, either.
So I have my own moral code and my own circle of influence. I never waiver from this and I think I’m living a pretty good life. I don’t see myself as selfish because I care about the people in my circle and my moral code doesn’t hurt anybody.
Now ask yourself if you’re really as open-minded as you claim to be.
Time to take this political, people
OK, here's the deal. I promised my wife I would stop getting political on Facebook. After reflecting on that, I agree with her. You see, when a person sends out a status update or note or link or whatever on Facebook then all friends see it. So you're almost forcing people to listen to what you have to say, whether they want to hear it or not. Now, of course, you can hide updates from friends, but then what is the point of having a friend on Facebook? So, in the interest of keeping things civil on Facebook I'm taking this blog down the political road. That way, you have to conscienceously make the effort to be insulted, and then it becomes your fault.
So let me outline what I'm going to be doing and some ground rules.
1. I will be talking (more like ranting) about highly controversial political issues.
2. I will be taking a hard conservative stance on these issues.
3. I will be linking to many other websites when talking about these issues.
4. I will be invoking the Constitution when talking about these issues.
5. I will be offending people. I don't care if you agree or disagree with me, you will be offended. This will include, but not be limited to, ridicule, name calling, and questioning intelligence/education.
5. If you don't like then don't read it.
6. I will try my best to make sure everything is spelled right and grammatically correct. If this is your only rebuttal to my rants is that I have not done this, then save your breath (or typing) because it is a pretty pathetic comeback.
7. I will make no apologies for my opinions.
You have been warned.
So let me outline what I'm going to be doing and some ground rules.
1. I will be talking (more like ranting) about highly controversial political issues.
2. I will be taking a hard conservative stance on these issues.
3. I will be linking to many other websites when talking about these issues.
4. I will be invoking the Constitution when talking about these issues.
5. I will be offending people. I don't care if you agree or disagree with me, you will be offended. This will include, but not be limited to, ridicule, name calling, and questioning intelligence/education.
5. If you don't like then don't read it.
6. I will try my best to make sure everything is spelled right and grammatically correct. If this is your only rebuttal to my rants is that I have not done this, then save your breath (or typing) because it is a pretty pathetic comeback.
7. I will make no apologies for my opinions.
You have been warned.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Episode 2
Episode 2 is ready for download. The topic is celebrity activists.
You can download it here:
http://podcastmachine.com/podcasts/1062/episodes/5045/media_files/14854/download/3/file_128kb.mp3
Thanks for listening.
You can download it here:
http://podcastmachine.com/podcasts/1062/episodes/5045/media_files/14854/download/3/file_128kb.mp3
Thanks for listening.
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
iTunes Issues
I'm trying to get this podcast setup on iTunes, but I keep getting a technical issues message.
Anyway, if you want to subscribe to the podcast here is the RSS link: http://feed.podcastmachine.com/podcasts/1062/mp3.rss
I will continue attempting to get setup on iTunes, though.
Anyway, if you want to subscribe to the podcast here is the RSS link: http://feed.podcastmachine.com/podcasts/1062/mp3.rss
I will continue attempting to get setup on iTunes, though.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)